In our first four years in government we will:
Interesting facts:
12 times more than the bible, 11 times more than the complete works of Shakespeare.
When chatGPT was asked to estimate the number of words in law relating to land and property in England and Wales it replied:
"Given the breadth and complexity of this legal area, providing an exact word count is impractical."
Why is this? Two reasons:
Legislation has built up over hundreds of years. New laws simply modified existing ones instead of repealing old legislation and replacing it with new - thus increasing size and complexity.
Law relating to land and property was written by those wishing to retain their ownership of land and property. Law relating to tax was written by those wishing to protect the financial interests of their supporters. Lawyers profit from complex law.
After the invasion of 1066 it took William the Bastard from Normandy a few months to enact laws giving himself personal ownership of all the land in the country. We don't know if he could read and write but he had no computers and no spreadsheets - only clerks with quill pens!
After building over 500 motte and bailey castles, and suppressing most rebellions, it took less than a year to carry out a survey of all land and property in the country and to record it in the Doomsday Book of 1086 so that taxes could be extracted.
If this could be done in the 11th century, with none of the technology we have at our disposal today, it will be even easier for us to repeal all legislation relating to land, property and taxes, and replace it with new laws, understood by all and with all the relevant data made freely available online for anyone to see
As far as land and property is concerned it involves no more than:
At the same time we will remove the anomalies of the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster and tidy up the relationship between the "crown", the "state", the "crown estate", the "monarchy" and the personal property of members of the current royal family. We do not propose to get rid of the monarchy though we will add the question to the referendum we will hold in the third year of our first parliament which will give people a voice on major issues that affect us all.
As far as tax law is concerned we will start with the principle that tax is entirely separate from the way that government decides to invest and spend. Tax law will not be used to provide exceptions or special cases - these can be dealt with as part of government spending.
This will greatly simplify tax law since we have then to deal with taxes on:
This won't please lawyers - but it can, and will, be done!
Because they have been tried and they don't work.
Implementing the list above will achieve the same thing.
The 2016 referendum on continuing membership of the European Union set a precedent of asking citizens their views on topics that government felt it was not fair to decide on its own. A similar idea exists in Switzerland and many states of the USA.
In the third year of our first parliament we will hold a referendum on important issues as they are at that time. At the moment the initial set of issues is:
People feel alienated and they have lost trust in politics and politicians because no one has made any effort to solve the unfair distribution of wealth in our country This opens the door for divide-and-rule, scapegoats and populists like Trump and Farage.
it is simple: people don't see society as fair, they see people getting rich while they become worse off, they see politicians accepting back-handers, donations and freebies every day - they feel ignored.
The FJP is the exact opposite. We put our people first, our policies are designed to be fair and we will ensure that everyone benefits from a fair and prosperous society.
This is not "an uncosted pipe dream" - it can be done despite the fact that those who benefit from our current corrupt system claim it can't.
Look at the list above. Is it fair? Is it what you have the right to expect in a happy society? Can we afford it? Yes we can!
We believe politics should be about principles and policies - not personalities.
Fairness means:
Is it fair that
Yes, easily!
It is a political decision to create an unfair society where the rich get richer and the rest go nowhere.
It is a political decision to create a fair society where we all benefit from a prosperous society.
We opt for the second decision, and, as a society, we can afford it - despite what economists tell us - after all, they were the ones who failed to anticipate the crash of 2007/8, they are the ones responsible for the boom/bust of our economy and they are the ones who led to 14 years of austerity after 2010.
To put it simply: most economists consistently get it wrong, they don't know what they are talking about and they are scared to death of looking at the world in a different way - a way that leads to fairness, not exploitation and poverty.
We have to stop thinking that government works in the same way as household budgets. We will never solve our problems if we think that "tax pays for things".
In the real world the government injects money into the economy, that money flows around to make things work then the government takes enough money back out (via tax) to prevent inflation. After all, you can't pay your taxes until the money comes from somewhere and the government is the only source of money!
It ain't, rocket science - but it is different from what we have been led to believe by economists, the media and politicians. More information here.